A year ago the U.S. market for specialized blast-resistant military trucks was worth just a few hundred million dollars annually. Then in May Secretary of Defense Robert Gates declared the so-called Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected trucks his number one weapons-buying priority and promised to order as many as 22,000 in the next four years. The total value? As much as $20 billion.
Almost overnight, every company with any automotive experience launched crash programs for MRAP designs. Competition has been fierce, with some of the biggest U.S. truck firms, Oshkosh for instance, losing out to small Mom-
and-Pop rivals including Ladson, S.C.-based Force Protection, Inc (five-day stock price pictured in blue). One surprise bidder was Protected Vehicle, Inc., founded in 2005 by former Force Protection president Garth Barrett and operating in Charleston, just miles away from Barrett’s former employer. While Force Protection enjoyed steady success with its Cougar and Buffalo designs, PVI struggled. In 2007 FP won around 2,000 MRAP orders and expanded its workforce and factory space; PVI got fewer than 100 orders and laid half of its 500 employees in August. Now Force Protection is poised to deliver the faltering firm a death blow, Forbes.com reports:
Force Protection Inc., which makes mine-resistant vehicles for the military, has filed a lawsuit claiming a nearby competitor stole trade secrets. The lawsuit filed Tuesday names Protected Vehicles Inc. and its founder, Garth Barrett, a former Force Protection president who resigned two years ago and started the new business about 10 miles away. The suit, which also names two other Protected Vehicles executives, claims while at Force Protection, Barrett made a copy of his computer hard drive “containing trade secrets and confidential information belonging to Force Protection.”
Related:
MRAP contenders whittled down
How to build a bazillion MRAPs
MRAP losers keep mum
Force Protection ramps up
Afghans get MRAPs, too
Related posts:


















[...] Related: MRAP lawsuit! MRAP contenders whittled down How to build a bazillion MRAPs MRAP losers keep mum Force Protection ramps up Afghans get MRAPs, too No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> [...]
[...] Related: General: reporters are a risk to MRAPs MRAP lawsuit! MRAP contenders whittled down How to build a bazillion MRAPs MRAP losers keep mum Force Protection ramps up Afghans get MRAPs, too No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> [...]
[...] Related: The MRAP that got away Military breaks own MRAP press rules General: reporters are a risk to MRAPs MRAP lawsuit! MRAP contenders whittled down How to build a bazillion MRAPs MRAP losers keep mum Force Protection ramps up Afghans get MRAPs, too No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> [...]
[...] Related: How to delay MRAP The MRAP that got away Military breaks own MRAP press rules General: reporters are a risk to MRAPs MRAP lawsuit! MRAP contenders whittled down How to build a bazillion MRAPs MRAP losers keep mum Force Protection ramps up Afghans get MRAPs, too No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> [...]
[...] * Afghanistan Diary: MRAPs Suck! * MRAP Report Sparks Investigation, Halts Whisteblower’s Work * Report: IED Crisis ‘Avoidable’ With Armored Trucks * Armored Rides Too Big for Iraq?* Marines Get Wise, Tone Down MRAP Order* Future Humvee vs. "Laws of Physics"* Big Armored Vehicles’ Big Surprise* Congress Raps Pentagon on Bomb-Resistant Vehicles* Report: Pentagon Going Overboard on MRAPs* Take Your V-Shaped Hull and Shove It* MRAP v Superbombs* MRAP V Superbomb: Round 2* How Much for the Girl — I Mean, MRAP?* MRAP Delivery Estimates Cut Over Half* Congress Moves to Protect MRAP Whistleblower * Iraq Diary: Sleep Through Those Bombs* MRAP Delivery Estimates Cut by Over Half * General: reporters are a risk to MRAPs* MRAP lawsuit!* MRAP contenders whittled down* How to build a bazillion MRAPs* Bomb-Fighting Vehicles Bite the Dust * Bomb-Resistant Vehicles’ Long Road to Acceptance * Picture This: MRAP Menagerie* Armor-Makers "Risked Soldiers’ Lives," Says Pentagon I.G. * Shortages for New Armored Vehicles?* Manufacturers Can’t Fill Bomb-Proof Vehicle Demand* Which Ride Takes Bomb-Blasts Best?* Military Dragged Feet on Bomb-Proof Vehicles* Marines 300, Insurgents 0 * Bomb-Proof Vehicles: Why the Delay? * Army Junking Future for New Rides?* Armored Vehicle Demand Blows Up [...]