<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Danger Room: Army Readies Its Mammoth Spy Blimp for First Flight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.warisboring.com/2012/05/22/danger-room-army-readies-its-mammoth-spy-blimp-for-first-flight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.warisboring.com/2012/05/22/danger-room-army-readies-its-mammoth-spy-blimp-for-first-flight/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=danger-room-army-readies-its-mammoth-spy-blimp-for-first-flight</link>
	<description>We go to war so you don&#039;t have to.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.warisboring.com/2012/05/22/danger-room-army-readies-its-mammoth-spy-blimp-for-first-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-1707136</link>
		<dc:creator>campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warisboring.com/?p=12915#comment-1707136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Airships offer immense advantages; especially in cost to build, operate, and maintain.   As military budgets continue to decrease; the use of airships will prove worthy of continued development.

However, the continued use of flexible envelope materials used for airships is self-defeating.   The high-tech Kevlar/Tedlar/ laminates are too expensive and available only from two or three suppliers worldwide.

Truly viable military airships must be constructed of rigid, inexpensive, readily available materials.  The historic precedent is aluminum; this, paired with carbon fiber can result in far more capable craft.

Continued use of traditional shapes is likewise laden with problems; ground control is extremely difficult when handling an immense lighter-than-air craft; the rounded lower hull and/or single ground contact of the traditional gondola is not enough to provide stability on the ground.   The LEMV has a wider ground contact area; a slight improvement over traditional blimp shapes. 

 Much greater attention needs to be placed on ground control.   The hyped &quot;hovercraft&quot; landing systems are insufficient.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Airships offer immense advantages; especially in cost to build, operate, and maintain.   As military budgets continue to decrease; the use of airships will prove worthy of continued development.</p>
<p>However, the continued use of flexible envelope materials used for airships is self-defeating.   The high-tech Kevlar/Tedlar/ laminates are too expensive and available only from two or three suppliers worldwide.</p>
<p>Truly viable military airships must be constructed of rigid, inexpensive, readily available materials.  The historic precedent is aluminum; this, paired with carbon fiber can result in far more capable craft.</p>
<p>Continued use of traditional shapes is likewise laden with problems; ground control is extremely difficult when handling an immense lighter-than-air craft; the rounded lower hull and/or single ground contact of the traditional gondola is not enough to provide stability on the ground.   The LEMV has a wider ground contact area; a slight improvement over traditional blimp shapes. </p>
<p> Much greater attention needs to be placed on ground control.   The hyped &#8220;hovercraft&#8221; landing systems are insufficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.247 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-02-12 09:03:15 -->
