More German Troops for Afghanistan

27.01.10

Categorie: Afghanistan, Alliances, Andrew Balcombe |
Tags: ,

German troops in Afghanistan. ISAF photo.

by ANDREW BALCOMBE

Responding to calls by its NATO partners to do more in Afghanistan, Germany has pledged to send 500 more troops. Germany also pledged 50 million euros to be spent on reintegrating Taliban fighters. On top of the 500 troops, an extra 350 have been promised as a “flexible reserve” if and when needed, according to Spiegel Online.

The plan forged by German Chancellor Angela Merkel must be approved by parliament, as the current parliamentary mandate allows for only 4,500 troops; the reinforcements would exceed that ceiling.

The pledge was made just two days before a critical conference on the future of Afghanistan taking place in London. The reinforcements come after the U.S. decided to send an extra 2,500 troops to the north of Afghanistan. In Germany, the American move was seen as a vote of “no confidence” in the German mission. German troops have been heavily criticized for staying in their bases while the Taliban gained influence all around them. They have also been accused of not accompanying the Afghan troops they train on missions — and of only moving around in large, heavily-armed convoys.

Related:
U.N. Dispatch: Afghanistan Moves Parliamentary Elections to September, U.N. Welcomes Delay
Dutch Troopers Accuse Officer of “Excessively Authoritarian Behavior”
New Zealand Commandos’ Kabul Exploits
New Zealand Commandos in Kabul Battle
U.N. Dispatch: Attack on Kabul
Axe-SPAN: Air Force Operations at Bagram Airbase, Afghanistan
Change.org: Enlisting the Taliban in the Fight against Polio
Admiral James Stavridis: “Terrific News” in Afghanistan
Axe-SPAN: Security Efforts in Logar Province, Afghanistan
Change.org: Afghan Watchdog Report Highlights War’s Toll on Children
Change.org: Ballots or Bullets — the War and Peace Elections of 2010
The Hague Online: Brothers in Arms
Axe-SPAN: U.S. Army Troops in Logar Province, Afghanistan
Change.org: Civilian Casualty Investigations Take Time
Change.org: We Don’t Really Know What Happened in Kunar
Interview with Dutch Major General Mart de Kruif, Former Commander, Regional Command South — Part Two
Interview with Dutch Major General Mart de Kruif, Former Commander, Regional Command South — Part One
Axe on Alyono: Pot-head Afghan Soldiers
Axe-SPAN: Videojournalist David Axe Vignette on Predator & Reaper Drones
Worrying over Afghanistan’s Pot-head Soldiers
Marco Kroon: Knighted Commando, Part Two
Marco Kroon: Knighted Commando, Part One
Axe-SPAN: U.S. Training of Afghan Air Force
World Politics Review: Dutch Government Mulls Departure from Afghan War
Columbia City Paper: The Impossible War — Obama Commits More Troops to Afghanistan, with the Wrong Strategy
VoA News: Training Afghan Forces Poses Challenge for U.S. Military
Axe-SPAN: On U.S. Training of Afghan Army and Police
VoA News: Logistics Play Key Role in U.S. War Effort in Afghanistan
Offiziere.ch: In Afghanistan, Helicopters Represent NATO’s Greatest Strength, Biggest Weakness
Wired.co.uk: A Man and His Drones — on the Front Line of Robotic Warfare
VoA News: U.S. Troops Experiment with New Strategy for Afghanistan
World Politics Review: After Setbacks, Human Terrain System Rebuilds
Taliban Propaganda Drools over Killed Vehicles
World Politics Review: U.S. Air Force Advisers Struggle with Afghan Cultural Gap
French Origins of the “Ink Spot”

No related posts.

|

One Response to “More German Troops for Afghanistan”

  1. para says:

    …and so we stumble on. Its an open secret in relevant German circles that we should rather send at least 2000 more troops, if we want to keep going. Thats what the military command estimates is needed. Of course on the other hand the party that sent troops there in the first place, now (that they lost the election) says: no more troops are needed, instead we should increase our (cough…already great…cough) police training work.

    This new pledge is just the pathetic attempt to look somewhat better than all the other participants (minus UK), who do not want to contribute any more troops. The thing is, it might actually work…

Leave a Reply